Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; April 1998; v. 83; no. 3-4; p. 213-219
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koziol, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Newton, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Experimental determination of the reaction; magnesite + enstatite = forsterite + CO 2 in the ranges 6-25 kbar and 700-1100 degrees C

Andrea M. Koziol, and Robert C. Newton

University of Dayton, Department of Geology, Dayton, OH, United States
University of Chicago, United States

The P-T equilibrium curve of the reaction of magnesite + enstatite = forsterite and CO 2 was determined in the ranges 6-25 kbar and 700-1100 degrees C by 53 reversed experiments carried out in 1.91 cm diameter piston-cylinder apparatus with NaCl pressure medium. Silver oxalate was used as a CO 2 source and charges were buffered at hematite-magnetite oxygen fugacity. Reaction progress was monitored by weight changes upon puncturing of CO 2 -inflated quenched charge capsules and was confirmed by comparing X-ray diffractograms of charges made before and after the experiments. The data satisfy the relation: P EQ = -3.215 to 4.784X10 (super -3) T+2.542X10 (super -5) T 2 with P in kbar and T in degrees C. A P-T curve calculated with the 1994 version 2.3 THERMOCALC program agrees well with our results except in the highest pressure range. Our data, together with three existing tight experimental brackets on the decarbonation reaction of magnesite to periclase and CO 2 , give Delta H 0 t (298 K) (forsterite) = -61.20+ or -0.87 kJ/mol from the oxides. This value is in agreement with the value adopted by Berman (1988). An analysis of various proposed equations of state for CO 2 shows that only those of Mader and Berman (1991) and Frost and Wood (1997) meet the constraints imposed by this study near 1000 degrees C and 10-20 kbar. The modified Redlich-Kwong (MRK)-based equations of state overestimate CO 2 fugacity in this pressure range.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
E. Melekhova, M. W. Schmidt, P. Ulmer, and E. Guggenbuhl
The reaction talc + forsterite = enstatite + H2O revisited: Application of conventional and novel experimental techniques and derivation of revised thermodynamic properties
American Mineralogist, July 1, 2006; 91(7): 1081 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
A. M. Koziol and A. M. Koziol
Experimental determination of siderite stability and application to Martian Meteorite ALH84001
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2004; 89(2-3): 294 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
J. M. Ferry, R. C. Newton, and C. E. Manning
Experimental determination of the equilibria: rutile + magnesite = geikielite + CO2 and zircon + 2 magnesite = baddeleyite + forsterite + 2 CO2
American Mineralogist, October 1, 2002; 87(10): 1342 - 1350.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
Y. N. Pal'yanov, A. G. Sokol, Y. M. Borzdov, A. F. Khokhryakov, and N. V. Sobolev
Diamond formation through carbonate-silicate interaction
American Mineralogist, July 1, 2002; 87(7): 1009 - 1013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
J. MATAS, P. GILLET, Y. RICARD, and I. MARTINEZ
Thermodynamic properties of carbonates at high pressures from vibrational modelling
European Journal of Mineralogy, August 1, 2000; 12(4): 703 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America