Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist GSW 2008 Users' Group Meeting
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November 2001; v. 86; no. 11-12; p. 1435-1446
© 2001 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reusser, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lumpkin, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geikielite exsolution in spinel

Eric Reusser1, Reto Gieré2,* and Gregory R. Lumpkin3

1 Institut für Mineralogie und Petrographie, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
2 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1397, U.S.A.
3 Materials Division, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia

Correspondence: * E-mail: giere{at}purdue.edu

Euhedral crystals of purple spinel are associated with calcite and forsterite in the central zone of composite metasomatic veins of the Adamello contact aureole (Northern Italy). In thin section, spinel is generally colorless, but exhibits concentric zones of dark brown color. These zones are aligned parallel to prominent crystal faces and contain abundant anisotropic, lath-shaped inclusions with their long axis oriented in the six <110> directions of spinel. This orientation results from the alignment of {001}Geik and the {111}Sp crystallographic planes. The small (up to approximately 20 x 1 µm) inclusions were identified as geikielite by means of element distribution maps, micro-Raman spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy.

Electron microprobe data revealed that spinel consists mainly of MgAl2O4, with only minor amounts of other components. The overall chemical variation within individual crystals is characterized by a continuous increase in FeOtot and ZnO from center to rim (0.6–2.1 wt% and <0.1–1.0 wt%, respectively). Whereas V2O3 is relatively constant (0.15 wt%), the bulk TiO2 concentration (analysis spot: 20 µm diameter) increases in general from center (0.12 wt%) to rim (1.2 wt%). This variation, however, is marked by several discontinuities that correspond to the zones containing geikielite inclusions. Where geikielite occurs, the spinel matrix is depleted in Ti relative to the inclusion-free zones. Geikielite was analyzed by analytical electron microscopy and has the formula Mg0.83Fe0.15Mn0.02(Ti0.99Fe0.01)O3.

The textural relationships between geikielite inclusions and spinel matrix, combined with the analytical data, suggest that geikielite laths represent exsolution features, thus, a miscibility gap exists between Mg-Al-spinel and geikielite. The purple color results from scattering of light by the geikielite inclusions. Spinel with similar features was also observed in metasomatic veins of the Bergell contact aureole (Italy) and in granulite-facies marbles of Southern India.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America