Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; July 2001; v. 86; no. 7-8; p. 862-870
© 2001 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becker, U.
Right arrow Articles by Rosso, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Step edges on galena (100): Probing the basis for defect driven surface reactivity at the atomic scale

Udo Becker1,* and Kevin M. Rosso2

1 Institut für Mineralogie, Universität Münster, Corrensstr. 24, D-48149 Münster, Germany
2 W.R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, MSIN K8-96, Richland, Washington 99352, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: ubecker{at}uni-muenster.de

Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) images of the PbS (100) surface with a step and several kinks were obtained with atomic resolution. These images show an increased tunneling current at step edge sites and an apparent deformation of the lattice near the step. The experimental images are compared with theoretical ab initio calculations for which we developed a hybrid method of constant current and constant height mode STM image simulation. With these calculations, we find that the apparent deformation is mainly an electronic effect rather than relaxation of atoms. In addition, with the help of these calculations, we can identify the changes of individual terrace-like and step-like orbitals that are observed using the STM in terms of the energy, density and shape of these states. This detailed knowledge of the electronic behavior of the PbS surface near a step can be used as a basis for explaining adsorption, acid/base, and redox behavior on PbS terraces and at steps, and the differences between the two.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
D. J. Vaughan and K. M. Rosso
Chemical Bonding in Sulfide Minerals
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 231 - 264.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
K. M. Rosso and D. J. Vaughan
Sulfide Mineral Surfaces
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 505 - 556.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
K. M. Rosso and D. J. Vaughan
Reactivity of Sulfide Mineral Surfaces
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 557 - 607.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America