Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; January 2004; v. 89; no. 1; p. 126-131
© 2004 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berger, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

An improved equation for crystal size distribution in second-phase influenced aggregates

Alfons Berger*

Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 1, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

Correspondence: * E-mail: berger{at}geo.unibe.ch

A model is presented to calculate crystal size distributions (CSDs) for coarsened mineral aggregates. The equations consider the second-phase particles inside coarsening aggregates. This approach is different from other published kinetic growth equations. The proposed model includes grain size limits due to the presence of second-phase particles. These limits control the behavior of growing grains. The physical basis for this model is taken from a neighborhood-coarsening model. The model is able to compute coarsening of a given set of crystal sizes, to simulate the evolution of the CSD, and to describe the influence of the amount and size of the second-phase particles. The model is limited to rocks that can be described as matrix with second phases. For very low second-phase concentrations (volume fraction <0.01), the model gives results similar to Lifshitz-Slyozov-Wagner models (LSW). In the case where the second-phase content is extremely high (volume fraction >0.5), the model would not allow coarsening or the system can be no longer described as matrix and second-phase particles. Depending on the size and amount of second phases, the CSD develops similar to LSW at high growth rates, but intermediate growth rates produce CSDs that are unknown in other closed-system coarsening models.

To test the model, natural data from a contact-metamorphic calcite marble with different mica contents have been compared with simulated CSDs. The measured and simulated CSDs can be well described by the proposed model for variable amounts of second-phase particles. The two-phase model is applicable to impure carbonates, mica-bearing quartzites, or impure dunites. The proposed model has interesting applications to experimental data, where porosity may influence grain coarsening.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America