Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February 2005; v. 90; no. 2-3; p. 399-410; DOI: 10.2138/am.2005.1609
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mercier, P. H.J.
Right arrow Articles by Redhammer, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Fundamental difference between synthetic powder and natural or synthetic single-crystal 1M micas: Geometric homo-octahedral vs. geometric meso-octahedral sheets

Patrick H.J. Mercier1,{dagger}, Denis G. Rancourt1,*, Jean-Louis Robert2, Rob G. Berman3 and Guenther J. Redhammer4

1 Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada
2 Centre de Recherches sur la Synthèse et la Chimie des Minéraux (CRSCM), CNRS, 1A, rue de la Férollerie, F45071 Orléans, Cédex 2, France
3 Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth St., Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada
4 Institute of Mineralogy, University of Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria

Correspondence: * E-mail: dgr{at}physics.uottawa.ca

Based on powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD) measurements of many mica solid solution series of synthetic powder samples (between Mg, Co, Ni, and Fe end-members, with different degrees of oxidation, vacancy, and Al/Si contents, and including an OH/F substitution series; 75 samples indexed as 1M polytype, space group C2/m) and on 175 previously published structural refinements of 1M micas (refined in space group C2/m) comprising 37 synthetic and 138 natural single-crystal samples, we show that the relation


between the a, c, and ß monoclinic lattice parameters (ß* = 180E – ß), holds exactly (within experimental error) for all the synthetic powder samples whereas it does not hold in general for the natural or synthetic single crystal samples. This relation is not imposed by the C2/m space group. It is predicted to hold for geometric homo-octahedral sheets (having equal M1 and M2 site bond-lengths) and predicted not to hold in general for geometric meso-octahedral sheets (having unequal M1 and M2 site bond lengths). We conclude that synthetic powder samples (usually having particle diameters in the range 0.1–20 µm) are geometric homo-octahedral whereas single crystals (typical size of 0.05 x 0.05 x 0.01 mm or larger) are geometric meso-octahedral, with either M1 > M2 (most common, 153 samples out of 175) or M1 < M2. The geometric meso-octahedral character of the single crystals is corroborated by several parameters of the structure refinements. The synthetic powders presumably appear not to have had the time to equilibrate into a minimal free energy state, possibly because average diffusion hoping times occurring in those syntheses (compared to synthesis times) are larger than under synthesis conditions that lead to single-crystals (e.g., fluxing agents used in single-crystal syntheses, geological conditions of natural samples), whereas all the single crystal samples have to some extent exploited the free energy advantage of sorting smaller and larger cations into distinct crystallographic sites in a geometric meso-octahedral sheet structure. These results suggest further experimental work in which the conditions for and kinetics of octahedral M1/M2 chemical ordering could be studied.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
R.G. Berman, L. Ya. Aranovich, D.G. Rancourt, and P.H.J. Mercier
Reversed phase equilibrium constraints on the stability of Mg-Fe-Al biotite
American Mineralogist, January 1, 2007; 92(1): 139 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
P. H.J. Mercier, D. G. Rancourt, G. J. Redhammer, A. E. Lalonde, J.-L. Robert, R. G. Berman, and H. Kodama
Upper limit of the tetrahedral rotation angle and factors affecting octahedral flattening in synthetic and natural 1M polytype C2/m space group micas
American Mineralogist, May 1, 2006; 91(5-6): 831 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
P. H.J. Mercier, R. J. Evans, and D. G. Rancourt
Geometric crystal chemical models for structural analysis of micas and their stacking polytypes
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2005; 90(2-3): 382 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America