Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; July 2006; v. 91; no. 7; p. 1006-1024; DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.2008
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Microstructure and magnetism in the ilmenite-hematite solid solution: A Monte Carlo simulation study

Richard J. Harrison*

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, U.K.

Correspondence: * E-mail: rjh40{at}esc.cam.ac.uk

The energetics of magnetic and cation ordering have been modeled using an atomistic approach based on empirical exchange interaction parameters. The model has been applied to the study of magnetic and cation ordering in the ilmenite-hematite solid solution via Monte Carlo simulations, providing new insight into the effect of nanoscale microstructures on the magnetic properties of this system. The lowest energy state for intermediate compositions is an intergrowth of cation-disordered antiferromagnetic (AF) hematite and cation-ordered paramagnetic (PM) ilmenite, separated by mixed Fe2+/Fe3+ "contact layers." The intergrowth carries a stable defect moment ("lamellar magnetism") due to the presence of uncompensated spins. The net magnetization is parallel to the spin alignment direction, i.e., perpendicular to the spin-canted magnetization of the AF hematite. Contact-layer spins are coordinated to fewer magnetic neighbors than bulk spins and thus disorder more rapidly on heating. This leads to a decrease of net moment with increasing temperature. A small net moment is present, however, up to the Néel temperature of the AF hematite phase. The maximum temperature for acquisition of a chemical remanent magnetization due to lamellar magnetism is 800 ± 25 K, corresponding to the temperature for the eutectoid reaction PM hematite -> AF hematite + PM ilmenite. If only cation interactions are considered, Fe3+ and Fe2+ in the contact layers become ordered so that Fe3+ shares an octahedral face with Fe3+ in the neighboring hematite layer and Fe2+ shares an octahedral face with Ti4+ in the neighboring ilmenite layer. If both cation and magnetic interactions are considered, however, an alternative ordering scheme is stabilized, whereby Fe3+ shares an octahedral face with Ti4+ in the neighboring ilmenite layer and Fe2+ shares an octahedral face with Fe3+ in the neighboring hematite layer.

The model has been used to investigate the nature of exchange coupling between ordered/anti-ordered domains and disordered antiphase boundaries, with a view to elucidating the mechanism of self-reversed thermoremanent magnetization. Antiphase boundaries are enriched in Fe relative to the ordered/antiordered domains, with enhanced enrichment observed in simulations performed within the PM hematite + PM ilmenite miscibility gap. Monte Carlo simulations of magnetic ordering show no evidence of self-reversal in systems containing two equally well-ordered ferrimagnetic (FM) domains separated by Fe-enriched AF boundaries. Systems displaying partial long-range order, however, do display self-reversed magnetization. Partial long-range order is characterized by a mixture of highly ordered Ti-rich FM domains and poorly ordered Fe-rich domains with a weak FM moment. The magnetic ordering temperature of the poorly ordered Fe-rich domains is significantly higher than that of the highly ordered Ti-rich domains, and act as the "x-phase." Evidence in support of the proposed mechanism from neutron diffraction and transmission electron microscopy is presented.

Key Words: Magnetism • microstructure • ilmenite • hematite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
B. P. Burton, P. Robinson, S. A. McEnroe, K. Fabian, and T. B. Ballaran
A low-temperature phase diagram for ilmenite-rich compositions in the system Fe2O3-FeTiO3
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2008; 93(8-9): 1260 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
E. J. Palin and R. J. Harrison
A Monte Carlo investigation of the thermodynamics of cation ordering in 2-3 spinels
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2007; 92(8-9): 1334 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
R. J. Harrison
Neutron Diffraction of Magnetic Materials
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 63(1): 113 - 143.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America