Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February 2008; v. 93; no. 2-3; p. 373-383; DOI: 10.2138/am.2008.2600
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelts, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Anthony, E. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Monazite occurrence, chemistry, and chronology in the granitoid rocks of the Lachlan Fold Belt, Australia: An electron microprobe study

Aaron B. Kelts, Minghua Ren* and Elizabeth Y. Anthony

Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79902, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: ren{at}geo.utep.edu

In-situ electron-microprobe dating of monazite holds the promise of being an effective technique for obtaining chronologic data. Our research focuses on I- and S-type granitoids of the Lachlan Fold Belt, Australia, whose petrology and zircon chronology have been thoroughly characterized. This study documents the textural relationships, morphology, zoning, and ages of monazite in these granitoid rocks. The I-type granitoids that lack monazite usually contain other mineral phases enriched in rare earth elements, such as allanite, titanite, and bastnasite. Only silica-rich, highly evolved I-type granitoids contain monazite. This preference in I-type rocks for phases other than monazite to host the REE and Th limit the applicability of monazite dating for this group of igneous rocks. On the other hand, monazite is ubiquitous in S-type rocks, both as interstitial and included grains. High-resolution X-ray maps of individual monazites reveal complex patterns of chemical zoning. Weighted averages of multiple analyses for individual chemical domains show small but systematic differences in age. These weighted averages of the chemical domains are considered the best estimate of the age of the monazite. Monazites from 8 different S-type samples range in age from 405 to 759 Ma, with the majority being 490 Ma and older. These are premagmatic ages for these granitoids, which have crystallization ages of 400 to 430 Ma. These premagmatic ages are similar to Cambro-Ordovician ages obtained from inherited zircon cores in the same granitoids, indicating that monazite can survive anatexis in peraluminous rocks. Thus, monazite dating in peraluminous rocks may illuminate characteristics (composition and age) of source rocks and anatectic processes.

Key Words: Monazite • in-situ dating • electron microprobe • granite • Lachlan Fold Belt • chronology







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America