Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
American Mineralogist; April 2008; v. 93; no. 4; p. 676-684; DOI: 10.2138/am.2008.2558
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCubbin, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nekvasil, H.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Maskelynite-hosted apatite in the Chassigny meteorite: Insights into late-stage magmatic volatile evolution in martian magmas

Francis M. McCubbin* and Hanna Nekvasil

Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-2100, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: fmccubbi{at}ic.sunysb.edu

Apatite-hosting maskelynite and alkali maskelynite within regions interstitial to cumulus olivine differ compositionally from that found within melt inclusions in the Chassigny martian meteorite. Feldspar glass compositions within the interstitial regions evolve along a high-temperature crystallization path. Within the melt inclusions, feldspar glass shows evolution to low temperatures, extending into the subsolidus regime. Coupled with these differences in maskelynite compositions are differences in volatile abundance in apatite included within the maskelynite. Apatite found within the large olivine-hosted polyphase melt inclusions is uniformly fluorapatite, whereas that interstitial to cumulus olivine is chlor-fluorapatite.

We propose that the differences in maskelynite and apatite compositions within the melt inclusion and interstitial regions arose primarily from different crystallization conditions. Melt-inclusion maskelynite and apatite are consistent with nearly closed-system buildup of magmatic volatiles during crystallization within the melt inclusions, exsolution of a Cl-bearing fluid phase, and retention of this fluid phase within the melt inclusions into the hydrothermal regime. For the interstitial regions, however, the higher solidus temperatures of the interstitial melts, the early crystallization of feldspar with significant ternary component, and the Cl-rich nature of the apatite, all suggest open-system fluid migration through the cumulus pile, ingress of Cl-rich, H2O-poor brine from a hotter, less evolved portion of the magma plumbing system, and interaction of this Cl-rich fluid with melt prior to the crystallization of feldspar. Such processes of fluid migration through a cumulus pile have been suggested on Earth in layered intrusions, and apatite is the primary recorder of this process.

Key Words: Magmatic volatiles • chlorine • water • fluorine • Chassigny • Mars • SNC meteorite • apatite






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America