Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; October 2009; v. 94; no. 10; p. 1440-1449; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.3223
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, M.
Right arrow Articles by Armbruster, T.

Sursassite: Hydrogen bonding, cation order, and pumpellyite intergrowth

Mariko Nagashima1,*, Masahide Akasaka2, Tetsuo Minakawa3, Eugen Libowitzky4 and Thomas Armbruster1

1 Mineralogical Crystallography, Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Freiestrasse 3, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
2 Department of Geoscience, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Shimane University, Matsue 690-8504, Japan
3 Department of Earth Science, Faculty of Science, Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-5877, Japan
4 Institute of Mineralogy and Crystallography, University of Vienna—Geocenter, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

Correspondence: * E-mail: mariko.nagashima{at}krist.unibe.ch

The crystal chemistry of sursassite, simplified formula Mn22+ Al3Si3O11(OH)3, from six different localities [(1) Falotta, Switzerland, (2) Woodstock, New Brunswick, Canada, (3) Kamisugai, Japan, (4) Kamogawa, Japan, (5) Molinello, Italy, and (6) Gambatesa, Italy] was studied using electron microprobe analysis (EMPA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. The structure has two symmetry independent Mn sites. The Mn1 site is seven coordinated by O and hosts, in addition to Mn2+, up to 20% Ca, whereas Mn2 has octahedral coordination and is strongly selective for Mn2+. In the simplified formula, three smaller octahedral M sites are occupied by Al. However, M1 also accepts significant amounts of divalent cations, such as Cu, Mg, Fe, and Mn, whereas M2 is occupied exclusively by Al. The unit-cell parameters of sursassite are a = 8.698–8.728, b = 5.789–5.807, c = 9.778–9.812 Å, β = 108.879–109.060°, V = 465.7–470.0 Å3, the space group is P21/m. Structure refinements converged to R1 values of 2.15–6.62%. In agreement with bond-valence analyses, at least three OH groups, depending on the concentration of divalent cations at M1, are found at the O6, O7, and O11 positions. However, the bond-valence sum at O10 is always low, thus partial hydroxylation is assumed at O10 to maintain charge balance. Owing to the influence of divalent cations at M1 in sursassite the hydrogen-bond systems in sursassite and isostructural macfallite are different. The FTIR spectrum in the region of OH-stretching vibrations is characterized by three strong bands at 3511, 3262, and around 2950 cm–1, the latter being broad. The band at 2950 cm–1 is assigned to strong hydrogen bonds between O6 and O10 (O6···O10 = 2.66 Å). Residual difference-Fourier peaks in the refinement of the Kamogawa and Molinello (specimen 1) crystals indicated less than 5% pumpellyite intergrowth.

Key Words: Sursassite • hydrogen bond • infrared spectroscopy • crystal structure • macfallite • pumpellyite







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America